Wednesday, August 26, 2020

The Color Purple by Alice Walker Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

The Color Purple by Alice Walker - Essay Example Personal data Alice Walker’s origination was in Eatonton, a little city in Georgia. Her dad (Willie Lee Walker) was essentially a rancher, and her mom (Minnie Lou Walker), a servant. Dissimilar to other African American guardians during 1940s in America, Walker’s mother was keen on her daughter’s instruction. She didn't permit her little girl to be a specialist in the homestead or to function as a servant. Rather, she attempted her level best to give appropriate instruction to her little girl. One can see that Walker’s future life was profoundly affected by her mother’s choice to lead her towards training. Stephanie Fitzgerald expresses that, â€Å"From the time she was youthful, Alice realized that the world was a better place for a dark youngster in the South than it was for a white kid anywhere† (22). Along these lines, Walker finished her school instruction. Afterward, she chose to proceed with her training and went to Spelman College and another school named as Sarah Lawrence College. At the point when she was an undergrad, she got pulled in towards social activism and this transformed her. For example, Walker’s activism identified with the Civil Rights Movement in America is imperative. Additionally, Walker thought about that enemy of war fight/activism was critical to stretch out her support of the poor. Walker’s individual life demonstrates that she was prepared to acknowledge decent variety. For example, she wedded Leventhal in the year 1967. One can see that this marriage was progressive since Walker is an African American and Leventhal, a Jew. On the opposite side, Walker gave abundant significance to her vocation as an author since she realized that managing consuming issues in the general public isn't not quite the same as social activism. Plot: The Color Purple The novel’s plot is interconnected with the tragic predicament of an African American young lady in the American culture. The storyteller of the novel, named as Celie, faces various issues in her family. Celie was vulnerable on the grounds that her folks didn't attempt to give appropriate training to her. Furthermore, she had to experience sexual abuse from her progression father. Katharina Eder clarifies that, â€Å"At the start of the story the peruser realizes, how Celie, at that point a multi year old young lady is assaulted by her, at that point thought to be father†(5). Inevitably, her mom bites the dust and her dad got wild. Her dad didn't permit Celie’s sister (Nettie) to wed Mr. Johnson. Rather, Celie’s father constrains her to wed Mr. Johnson. Inside this specific circumstance, Celie’s individual life turned out to be progressively risky on the grounds that Mr. Johnson regarded her as a slave, not as his better half. At Mr. Johnson’s home, Sofia (Mr. Johnson’s son’s spouse) instructed Celie that ladies must not repress to men. Once, Mr. Johnsonâ₠¬â„¢s darling (state, Shug Avery) happens to be sick and experiences bed rest at their home. Step by step, Celie gets pulled in towards Shug. On the opposite side, Sofia was not prepared to be heavily influenced by her significant other and she abandons her better half. Also, Shug started to meddle into Celie’s individual issues and helped her to find out about her sister. Afterward, Celie happens to realize that her sister is alive and is working with a teacher in Africa. Plus, Celie’

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Hamlet :: essays research papers

William Shakespeare’s perfect work of art, "Hamlet, Prince of Denmark" is a lamentable dramatization which spins around the subjects of treachery, retribution and dawdling. Despite the fact that these ideas are appeared all through the play, they are particularly appeared in Act V, Scene I. This scene is critical in light of the fact that it rotates around the three fundamental thoughts of the play. It represents how these three specific thoughts lead to the destruction of practically the entirety of the significant characters. The scene opens with two undertakers setting up a site for Ophelia’s entombment. As they burrow, they talk about the flawed conditions of her passing. They contemplate whether her suffocating was purposeful or unintentional. Hamlet and Horatio, unconscious of who will be covered at this site, enter and start a discussion with one of them. The First Gravedigger lets them know of his activity and how he has covered individuals from varying backgrounds. This leads Hamlet to contemplate demise. As the discussion proceeds with that a skull the undertaker was playing with had a place with an old court jokester, he once knew. He begins plate how passing makes even the most influential men, as Caeser, only residue, yet his discourse is hindered by Ophelia‘s, burial service parade. Hamlet and Horatio stow away to see what's going on and decide whose passing everybody is grieving. As they watch Claudius, Gertrude and Laertes mourn for the obscure individual, it is f ound out that Ophelia is just qualified for constrained customs because of the flawed conditions behind her demise. The personality of the expired is uncovered to Hamlet when the despondency stricken Laertes discusses his distress over the death of his dear sister. Defeat by feeling, Hamlet uncovers himself to everybody. He shouts the he cherished Ophelia more than any other individual, including Laertes, ever could. This goads Laertes and he assaults the ruler. After a concise battle between the two, Hamlet leaves. The scene finishes as King Claudius endeavors to quiet Laertes down with the possibility that vengeance against Hamlet is coming. The occasions of this scene the sum total of what could have been forestalled in the event that it wasn’t for the three wrong acts the principle characters in this play contain. The first is selling out. Which is a circuitous reason for Ophelia’s demise, yet in addition each other catastrophe in this dramatization. The homicide of King Hamlet is the principal case of this. Claudius’ terrible demonstration of harming his sibling and wedding his significant other is the most conspicuous demonstration of treachery in the play.

Sunday, August 16, 2020

The Importance of Pencils

The Importance of Pencils As a college student, I dont think about pencils too much. Recently though, that has been changing a bit. You see, before one of my recent exams I discovered that I didnt have a reliable pencil in my backpack. I couldnt believe it! This was especially shocking considering that I have so many class handouts and activity sheets still hanging around in my backpack. Surely, I would have a functioning pencil lying in there somewhere. This incident made me think about why I didnt have a pencil ready for the exam. Each class I am in and the homework that accompanies it is all digital. Homework can be found on an online platform called Compass. Group project members communicate through the GroupMe app. All my other internship work is usually done over email. I guess you could say that I neglected the pencil over time. The truth is that the pencil is very important to what youll be doing in college. There are many great uses for this classic tool. Taking notes by hand using a pencil can be very helpful. Several of my friends have even picked up the art of sketching with a pencil. Its important while in college to not get too caught up in the digital world. Many of your activities will be on a computer or a smart phone. Once in a while, remember to use some of the more essential tools. Take a walk and get away from the group chat. Go visit with friends in real life. But first, remember to always pack your trusty ole pencil. Jacob Class of 2019 I’m an Advertising student within the College of Media. My hometown is a place called Fairmount, Illinois, which is about 30 minutes from campus. I began my Illinois journey in the Division of General Studies.

Sunday, May 24, 2020

Case Citation Barnes V. Glen Theatre - 856 Words

Case Citation: BARNES v. GLEN THEATRE, INC 1990 History: The Kitty Kat Lounge, Inc. and Glen Theatre, Inc filed a lawsuit in the District Court to stop the enforcement of the Indiana State public indecency law. The Kitty Kat Lounge, Inc. and Glen Theatre, Inc claimed the statute violated the First Amendment. The Kitty Kat Lounge, Inc. and Glen Theatre, Inc stated the nude dancing in the establishments was not public indecency but self-expression. The court found the nude dancing in the Kitty Kat Lounge, Inc. and Glen Theatre, Inc was not expressive and therefore not protected by the First Amendment. The Court of Appeals reversed and said nude dancing performed for entertainment is protected expression. Facts: The Kitty Kat Lounge, Inc. and Glen Theatre, Inc., are South Bend companies that mainly focus on adult entertainment and nudity to make money. Dancers and performers from the businesses also claim that a certain type of nude dancing generates a better income. The Kitty Kat Lounge sells alcohol and offers female dancers. The lounge wants to have completely nude dancers but is prevented by an Indiana statute that regulates public nudity. The statue requires that the dancers wear certain types of clothing to cover the vaginal area. The have to wear â€Å"pasties† or â€Å"G-strings† when they dance. The dancers work on commission. One of the respondent dancers in the action, claimed she would make more money is she if she danced nude. Glen Theatre another South Bend business was

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Early Childhood Education- The High Scope Curriculum Free Essay Example, 2000 words

This allows the students to have a sense of planning and they are aware of what they need to expect next. As explained in the High Scope Educational Research Foundation: â€Å"A central element of the preschool daily routine is the "plan-do-review sequence"; other key elements are small- and large-group times, greeting time, and outside time† (HighScope Educational Research Foundation, 2009). Usability and Assessments: The High Scope Educational Research foundation has clearly stated the assessment style used for the programs, â€Å"The COR (Child Observation Record) is used to evaluate child progress in High/Scope infant-toddler and preschool programs. The Preschool Program Quality Assessment (PQA) is used to evaluate the quality of the program, focusing on five key areas: learning environment, daily routine, adult-child interaction, curriculum planning and assessment, and parent involvement and family services† (HighScope Educational Research Foundation, 2009). The High Scope Curriculum has slowly grown to become a major style of education in the country. Over the years more states and local school districts have tried to utilise more universal programs that would help in the education of the students. The high Scope program is very simple to use and every aspect of the classroom and the program is very carefully chosen. We will write a custom essay sample on Early Childhood Education- The High Scope Curriculum or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Special care is taken to choose the right space and material (Henniger, 2009). Also the best possible combination is utilized to promote the active learning among children while making education fun. There is excellent usage of space and equipments and in most cases the centre is divided based on the interest areas, i.e. specific areas are assigned for specific kinds of study and play. The most common of these are areas like block area, small toys area, book area, sand and water area, art area and house area (David, 1973). This arrangement, of the program, makes it very flexible and also allows it to be easily adopted by various schools and is compatible with the needs of the state standards. Since the program has been designed based on a research of the child instructions, staff development, it hence meets all the needs of the Pre – kindergarten model as well (Henniger, 2009). Benefits of High Scope Curriculum: Complete Child Care: The High Scope Curriculum that has been developed has been focused completely on being ‘child centric’. The importance of needs of children is given complete attention. According to the Early Years Reports, this, i.e.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Discuss in detail Shakespeare’s presentation of women in Much Ado About Nothing Free Essays

string(29) " other characters it is not\." The role of women in the 1600’s was to be submissive, passive, to obey men and to be seen rather than heard; as is depicted in the female characters in many of Shakespeare’s plays such as Juliet in Romeo and Juliet and Queen Gertrude in Hamlet. However, the characters in Shakespeare’s plays are predominantly male, they include very few female characters and Much Ado About Nothing is no exception. Each of the female characters in this play represents a different role of a 16th century woman. We will write a custom essay sample on Discuss in detail Shakespeare’s presentation of women in Much Ado About Nothing or any similar topic only for you Order Now The reason for the relatively small number of female character’s in Shakespeare’s plays is for both practicality, as all female roles in Shakespeare’s plays were performed by men, but can also be seen as a reference to women’s relatively insignificant status in society. A woman’s virginity and chastity were what her reputation was solely based on. Her status was gained by marriage and women in this time were raised to believe they were inferior to men, this status is reflected in the character of Hero. Shakespeare seems to portray the conventional role of a Shakespearean woman through Hero. Her silent and submissive nature is what shows her weakness to being controlled by other characters. This is predominantly men; however, Beatrice also speaks over Hero, challenging the male chauvinistic stereotype by placing characteristics commonly associated with males, in a female character. This is most noticeable in act 2 scene1, where Leonato, Beatrice, Hero and Antonio are discussing the topic of Hero’s future. Shakespeare uses Hero’s lack of a response to anything the other character’s are saying in deciding her fate to emphasise society’s expectancies of Hero, and girls like Hero, in Shakespearean times. Shakespeare uses the character Beatrice to represent a less conventional 16th century woman, independent and outspoken. By contrasting the roles of Beatrice and Hero against each other in this way Shakespeare more effectively presents the differences between these two characters. Shakespeare also mirrors the role of Beatrice in Margaret. Beatrice unlike Hero does not have a prestigious reputation to maintain. Other characters refer to Beatrice, often by name, in comparison to Hero as ‘niece’, ‘daughter’, and ‘cousin’. The way in which Beatrice talks to the male characters is unusual for her time, she is outspoken and does not hold back on voicing her opinions. In the 16th century women could be punished by law for having such mannerisms as this. Beatrice is particularly bitter towards Benedick, to whom she is rude, ignorant and seems to take great delight in mocking at every available opportunity. In this respect Shakespeare challenges the male chauvinism of the time by matching Beatrice and Benedick, who both, at times, appear both as witty and stubborn as one another, despite Beatrice being a woman and therefore, supposedly (in accordance to society’s hierarchy at the time) an inferior match to Benedick. Beatrice’s stubborn nature is introduced from the very beginning of the play, in Act 1 Scene 1 where Beatrice makes no attempt to be subtle with her feelings towards Benedick. She promises â€Å"to eat all of his killing† calling him weak and challenging the praise he is receiving from the messenger who is saying â€Å"he hath done good service, lady, in these wars. † It can be interpreted, however, that Beatrice is perhaps trying too hard to convince the other characters of how much she dislikes Benedick, suggesting her stubborn and cruel nature is all just an act, Shakespeare uses Beatrice’s intense bitterness towards Benedick to provide the audience with sufficient evidence to suspect that something has happened between these two characters in the past to leave Beatrice with these thoughts. Shakespeare mirrors Beatrice in the character of Margaret. He seems to portray Margaret as a less powerful and dirtier minded Beatrice. She, like Beatrice, is outspoken and often seen as rude. However as Margaret is just a servant, Shakespeare uses this character for the lines that Beatrice could not get away with saying. The audience can more easily accept this rude and often suggestive (particularly when talking to male characters) humour. The suggestive aspect can be seen in act 5 scene 2. In which Margaret flirts with Benedick by saying â€Å"will you write me a sonnet in praise of my beauty? Shakespeare tries to make it known to the audience that Margaret is aware of her lowly status, by writing lines for her that are jokes at her own expense, such as in act 5 scene 2 â€Å"why shall I always keep below the stairs? â€Å", this can be interpreted however, as either Margaret’s acceptance of her role, or as a crude joke used to flirt with Benedick. Margaret’s come dy contrasts the intelligent wit Shakespeare writes for Beatrice. The character of Margaret’s purpose is to provide a different kind of humour in the play, perhaps as a relief from the witty and sarcastic banter between the other characters. Margaret talks back to Beatrice without any hesitation, as is seen in act 3 scene 4, where she mocks Beatrice in saying â€Å"a maid and stuffed†, this reinforces Margaret’s ill mannered nature, being used as a source of entertainment for the audience. This kind of talk would not be acceptable from the other characters, but Shakespeare builds up the character of Margaret to represent a more ill mannered and crude aspect of the play. Shakespeare does this both through Margaret’s main purpose – as an accomplice in the shaming of Hero – and the way in which she acts around the other characters, who are predominantly richer and more powerful than her. Margaret’s main purpose is to contribute to the shaming of Hero, which causes great controversy and outrage. It’s possible that Shakespeare involves Margaret in this event as a way of informing the audience that Margaret is of a far lower status than the other character’s and introduces the idea that it is acceptable for her to do many things that for the other characters it is not. You read "Discuss in detail Shakespeare’s presentation of women in Much Ado About Nothing" in category "Papers" The prime example being that even suspicion alone that Hero could be involved in such affairs causes outrage, and yet when it is discovered that it was in fact Margaret, not much more is said about the incident. In Act 2 scene 1 Beatrice compares marriage to a â€Å"scotch jig† giving a very bleak outlook on the subject by saying â€Å"for, hear me, Hero: wooing, wedding, and repenting, is a scotch jig†. By referring to the aftermath of the wedding as ‘†repenting† Beatrice makes her opinions on marriage very clear. The expectancy of women of this time was to get married and have children, and so by portraying such a passionate disdain towards the subject through Beatrice, Shakespeare challenges the stereotypical role of a woman. It is this attitude that likens Beatrice more so than Hero, to a modern day audience, the opinion that women’s sole purpose is not to marry and reproduce. Beatrice also makes a joke when Leonato says to her â€Å"well, niece, I hope to see you one day fitted with a husband† by responding with â€Å"Adam’s son are my brethren; and, truly, I hold it a sin to match in my kindred† this joke can be taken either at face value, as something Shakespeare has built up to be ‘typical Beatrice’, or seen as a way of avoiding what Leonato was really trying to say to her, as a way of covering her real feelings in case there is a lapse in her tough outer exterior. And yet when in Act 3 scene 1 when Hero, Margaret and Ursula try to gull Beatrice she seems, to a certain extent, to believe them. Shakespeare’s sudden portrayal of slight naivety in Beatrice can be interpreted as a way of showing the audience Beatrice has a more compassionate side, and that really she wants to believe this is true such as when she says â€Å"and, Benedick, love on; I will requite thee†. Another moment in which Beatrice shows compassion is when Benedick proposes his love to her, and her immediate reaction is to tell him to kill Claudio for what he has done to her cousin, Hero. She uses Benedick’s love for her cruelly as a way of forcing him to kill Claudio against his will when she says â€Å"you kill me to deny it. Farewell†. In some respects, the character of Beatrice is there to show an independent and opinionated woman, representative in some aspects as an early feminist and as a way of challenging the conventional role of a Shakespearean woman. However in the final scene even Beatrice the independent, witty and intelligent heroine succumbs to the persuasive ways of men, love and society. The character of Hero can be interpreted in one of two ways. Critics say that Hero is ‘conventional, not at all deep, but ladylike and deserving of sympathy’ this could be to uphold the reputation expected of her due to her father and as a result of this, her high social status which can be seen in act 2 scene 1. But Hero can also be interpreted as an intelligent young woman that simply knows the right, and similarly the wrong, times to speak; as can be seen in act 3 scene 4, a scene with only female characters in which Hero speaks of her own free will for herself. In Act 2 scene 1, Leonato makes it clear that it is his decision whom Hero marries; and not Hero’s. Yet Hero says nothing throughout. This is what can make the character of Hero so hard to relate to for a modern day audience, as this kind of behaviour is not as common or typical in a modern day girl of Hero’s age as it was in Shakespearean times. Although Hero’s lines in the play are often merely functional and slightly lacking, it is this; her lack of speech, that most effectively represents her character and role in society. The only time the audience is shown Hero’s wittier and more relaxed side is when she is surrounded by only female company. Beatrice in Act 2 scene 1however, does not hold back with her opinions, when Antonio says â€Å"well, niece, I trust you will be ruled by your father† Beatrice speaks for Hero by saying â€Å"yes, faith; it is my cousin’s duty to make curtsy and say ‘Father, as it please you'† This can be seen as Beatrice either mocking Hero, or taking pity on her. But at the same time rather aptly sums up Hero’s purpose. Hero has functional lines in the play and only really speaks when given permission, such as in act 2 scene 2 when she says â€Å"I will do any modest office, my lord† modest being the crucial word in this line. The first time we hear Hero speak for herself is at the masked ball. However, it can be interpreted that Shakespeare uses this opportunity for Hero to hide behind a mask to grant her the freedom to speak for herself, and in normal circumstances this would not be the case. In act 3 scene 1, we see a very different side to Hero than Shakespeare has previously portrayed. In this scene there are no men and so Hero is free to say as she ‘pleases’, this freedom is furthered by Ursula and Margaret, both servants, both females, and both, therefore, below Hero in terms of social status, being the only other characters in the scene. In this scene Hero is given more lines than she has throughout the rest of the entire play. The scene opens with Hero giving Margaret an order â€Å"run thee to the parlor; there shalt thou find my cousin Beatrice†¦ whisper her ear and tell her, I and Ursula walk in the orchard and our whole discourse is all of her† up until this point this kind of assertiveness and power is completely unexpected of Hero to the audience. Hero then goes on to give Ursula clear and precise orders of what she must do â€Å"when Beatrice doth come† however, in act 3 scene 4, where the characters present are again all female, Hero is not as outspoken and forward. However one of the characters present is Beatrice, this suggest that’s Beatrice overpowers Hero, and although Hero is technically more powerful and important than Beatrice, as she is Leonato’s daughter, her lines are still functional and infrequent such as â€Å"these gloves the count sent me; they are an excellent perfume†. Hero is mirrored – in a similar way to how Beatrice is mirrored in Margaret – in Ursula. Out of Margaret and Ursula, Margaret is – as it is between Beatrice and Hero – the more loud and opinionated one, as opposed to Ursula who is more quiet and reserved, and like Hero is given functional lines â€Å"madam, withdraw: the prince, the count, Signior Benedick, Don John, and all the gallants of the town, are come to fetch you to church†. In act 3 scene 4, Margaret is the dominant speaker, mocking Beatrice and talking back to Hero â€Å"troth, I think your other rabato were better. . Hero’s response to this â€Å"no pray thee, good Meg, I’ll wear this† is uncharacteristically sure of herself, showing that she didn’t really care about Margaret’s opinion, and chooses to ignore it. This suggests that Hero is perhaps not a pushover as she is made out to be, but rather knows her place and what is expected of her, and so, wh en she is around certain company (i. e men) she is more reserved, so as not to get herself into trouble, giving reason to suspect Hero is perhaps smarter than a modern day audience would give her credit for. The other character’s, in particular Claudio and Leonato’s, expectancy of Hero is really emphasised when Margaret and Borachio set her up to be shamed. As even suspicion of Hero doing such causes great controversy and trouble, and is near enough the sole cause of the rest of the problems in the play from then onwards. Whereas, when it is found out that it was in fact Margaret, the act is completely overlooked. This reinforces the importance of social status within the play. Shakespeare both challenges and supports male chauvinism at times by exploring the social boundaries of women. This is done through the characters of Beatrice and Margaret, with their outspoken nature and Beatrice’s seemingly unconventional outlook on life, but he does not cross these boundaries. As is seen in Act 4 scene 1 in which Shakespeare reflects and reinforces the separate roles 16th century society has created for males and females when Beatrice proclaims â€Å"O that I were a man! With Beatrice being the main character to challenge the conventional role of a woman, she – of all characters – being the one to say this, shows that there are still restraints put in place by society on things seen as acceptable for women to do. Beatrice repeats this line several times, interrupting Benedick with more of her self pitying rant every time he tries to defend his reasons for objecting to killing Claudio. This can be seen as giving Beatrice, an heir of ‘damsel in distress’ a conventional and necessary role in romantic comedy, which contrasts with her character’s less conventional role as a woman in the society she is in. Also in this scene, Shakespeare uses dramatic irony, when Claudio says â€Å"you seem to me as Dian on her orb† saying that Hero seems innocent, and pure, but he continues to say â€Å"but you are more intemperate in your blood† saying that he has realised Hero is not as she first appears and sees her more as someone who sleeps around. The audience, of course, knows this is not true. But the use of the dramatic irony here portrays the two sides of a woman, and shows how much Leonato’s reputation lies on Hero’s actions and status. Hero is a character that at first glance seems insignificant in the sense that she is rarely given opinions or a chance to speak. However the role that she plays is vital to romantic comedy as the young, innocent, female. This necessity of female characters to the plot and genre of the play despite their portrayal as being inferior to men is what is ironic in Much Ado About Nothing. How to cite Discuss in detail Shakespeare’s presentation of women in Much Ado About Nothing, Papers

Monday, May 4, 2020

IT Research Project Cloud Computing

Question: Describe about the Information Management in cloud computing? Answer: Information Management in cloud computing: Today our day to day life consists of digital data, which plays a major role to make our life secure and comfortable enough. An organization growth depends upon the various strategies and decisions, taken by the management. It becomes difficult when one adopt new technology for their business growth by analyzing various data. Hence an effective information management is needed in order to analyze a large amount of data and manage strategies. Management of Information System, which is based on cloud computing (CMIS), is capable of handling varieties of management related tasks. It provides accurate information to all the level of management in an organization for the analysis of data and to produce auto generated report. Here it is a consideration of virtual pool of various computing resources to meet users requirements, whenever it is needed on the basis of pay-per-use. Information management in cloud computing is considered as a set of procedures which enable to collect, to store and to process data, so that it can produce relevant information in order to maintain communication and flow of data among all levels of management. Banking this context: As a financial intermediation, banks nature is to provide financial services and conduct the intermediary service and financial service in the whole financial system by making loans and by accepting deposits. Now, here the question arises in traditional banking system- How banks conduct these roles? What is value added by the banks? How the security concerns are measured in order to store and share data using cloud? How the Encryption and tokenization is used? How some times the combination of Encryption and tokenization is used to hide the data from the intruders? All these operations are done with the involvement of cloud computing in order to synchronize the whole process and to maintain the integrity, so that no replication of data happen in the bank database, paper loads are also get decreased, costs are cut, improvement of scalability and flexibility (Banks are able to find the quick view of market scenario), increment of efficiency (the standardization inherent in the cloud can make it easier to introduce new technology), serve client faster by eliminating software and hardware delays, transaction banking make it easy for the payments took place, where buyer and sellers could be able to bring together on shared application using cloud (DELIVERY, 2015). Security: As far the security issues are concerned, using internet banking with traditional banking methods, is primary concern. Data security between web server and customer browser is handled by a security protocol called Secure Socket Layer (SSL), which provides server authentication, data encryption, integrity of messages, internet connection. SSL provides security handshake, which is used to initialize the connection. In current scenario, Washington Companys online banking application data encryption at highest level of 128 bit (Ibm.com, 2015). References DELIVERY, E. (2015). Electronic banking - advantages for financial services delivery. Academia.edu. Retrieved 23 February 2015, from https://www.academia.edu/2635617/Electronic_Banking_-_Advantages_For_Financial_Services_Delivery Ibm.com,. (2015). IBM : What is Cloud Computing : Types of Services and Deployment - India. Retrieved 23 February 2015, from https://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/in/en/what-is-cloud-computing.html